Strategic Studies of public policy

Strategic Studies of public policy

Identifying and presenting the classification of soft instrument in the governance & policy making system

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 PhD student, Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran Researcher of the governance office of the Islamic Council Research Center
2 MSc. Student in Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran,
3 Researcher of Islamic Council Research Center
4 Iran University of Science and Technology
5 MSc. Student in public policy, Faculty of Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Allameh Tabatabatt,Tehran,
Abstract
The requirements of the current world, including the necessity of citizens' participation, the lack of direct will of governments and the advancement of goals by influencing the interests and preferences of citizens, make it necessary to adopt a soft governance approach. In this regard, soft governance tools have been proposed and used in recent years. Soft tools are non-binding, interpretable, flexible and include a high degree of delegation in formation and formulation, and in this way, increase the quality of policies. The aim of the current research is to identify and typify soft policy-making tools in order to prepare a soft governance toolbox in the national policy-making system. The present research, by combining existing studies, identified 30 soft tools in the policy-making system, and with the aim of facilitating the use of these tools, with the focus group method, a classification based on two dimensions of the level of effectiveness of the tool (including: people / context and context)) and the purpose of using the tool (including: encouraging and persuading/accelerating and facilitating/improving quality/localizing/regulating/obstructing and deterring). Also, with the aim of smart implementation, it is necessary to consider the necessary platform in the use of each of the soft tools, and this category of tools should be used as a supplement and facilitator along with hard tools such as legislation.

Keywords:Administrative System efficiency, Policy Tools, Soft Governance, Soft Tools, classification of Tools
Keywords
Subjects

References
Arab hosseini, n. (1399). Identifying the mixed requirements of the smart policy and designing a toolbox to effectively support its implementation.
Banafi, M., & Ghorashi, S. M. (2020). The Role of Soft Instruments in Creating Hard Consequences in Governance: A Link between Public Policy and Law Case Study: Trafficking in Person Report. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies 3.4, 127-152. doi:10.22034/JIPAS.2021.314720.1286
Blomqvist, P. (2022). Soft and hard governing tools. Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972.00035
Brandsen, T., Booger, M., & Tops, P. (2006). Soft governance, hard consequences: The ambiguous status of unofficial guidelines. Public Administration Review 66.4, 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00615.x
Burke, D. C., & Saramago, A. (2018). Singapore's Use of Education as a Soft Power Tool in Arctic Cooperation. Asian Survey 58.5, 920-941. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.5.920
Conzelmann. (2008). Beyond the carrot and the stick: State reporting procedures in the World. London: Routledge.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining Gamification. Conference: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, (pp. 9-15). MindTrek. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Hart, N. M. (2020). A “Legal Eccentricity”: The European Parliament, its Non-binding Resolution, and the Legitimacy of the EU’s Trade Agreements. University of Bologna Law Review, 5(2), 327–361. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2531-6133/12291
Jacobsson, K. (2004). Soft regulation and the subtle transformation of states: the case of EU employment policy. Journal of European Social Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0958928704046878
Joachim J, Reinalda. B & Verbeek, B. (2008). "Chapter 1: International organizations and implementation: Pieces of the puzzle. " International Organizations and Implementation. Enforcers, Managers, Authorities?.  pp 3–18.   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936184
Jalal, M., & Mosleh, E. (2018). Soft technology is an essential tool for effective governance. The first conference on governance and public policy. Tehran. doi:https://civilica.com/doc/801015/
Moos, L. (2009). Hard and soft governance: The journey from transnational agencies to school leadership. European Educational Research Journal 8.3 , 397-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2009.8.3.397
Najafi Rastaghi , H., & ArabHosseini, N. (1401). Meta-synthesis of "soft technology"studies: moving towards a new approach to solving social and governance problems. Science and technology policy, 86-107. doi:20.1001.1.24767220.1401.12.3.4.3
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. SPRINGER.
Schemmel, J. (2016). The ESA Guidelines: Soft Law and Subjectivity in the European Financial Market—Capturing the Administrative Influence. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies Vol. 23 #2 , 455-503. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.23.2.0455
Senden, L. A. (2005). Soft law, self-regulation and co-regulation in European law: Where do they meet? Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 9.1. https://ssrn.com/abstract=943063
Sossin, L & Smith, C. (2003). “hard choices and soft law: ethical codes, policy guidelines and the role of the courts in regulating government” ALBERTA LAW REVIEW, 867-893. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/alr1344
Snyder, F. (1994). Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community. In The Construction of Europe. (pp. 197-225). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8368-8_10
Tallacchini, M. (2009). “Governing by Values. EU Ethics: Soft Tool, Hard Effects, ” Minerva, Special Issue: Governance of and Through Science and Numbers Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 281-306, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41821499
Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (2007). New Governance & Legal Regulation: Complementarity, Rivalry, and Transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law. [Link]
Tsakatika, M. (2007). A parliamentary dimension for EU soft governance. European Integration 29.5, 549-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07036330701694873
Van Gossum, P, Arts, B & Verheyen, K. (2012). “Smart regulation”: Can policy instrument design solve forest policy aims of expansion and sustainability in Flanders and the Netherlands? Forest Policy and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.010
Wurzel, R. K., Zito, A., & Jordan., A. (2013). From government towards governance? Exploring the role of soft policy instruments. German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse.
Zhouying, j. (2013). Global Technological Change From Hard Technology to Soft Technology. 2nd edition. Intellect Ltd.
Abdolhamid, M., Abdolhoseinzadeh, M., Esmaeili Givi, M., Saberi, M. K., Mirezati, S. Z., & Amiri, M. R. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on Public Administration: 1923-2020. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 21(1), 75-96.  https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2022.1977740.0
Abdolhoseinzadeh, M., Sanayi, M ,. Zolfagharzadeh, M.M,. (2017). The concept of open Government data policy and explain the advantages and benefits of the different policy fields. Strategic Studies of public policy, 7(22), 55-74. [Link]
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2022). Introduction to the Handbook on Theories of Governance. In handbook on theory of governance (pp. 1-16). Edward Elgar.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2002). Positive and negative feedback in politics. Policy dynamics, 1, 3-28. [Link] 
Bhandari, A., & Badre, D. (2018). Learning and transfer of working memory gating policies. Cognition, 172, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.001
Blomqvist, P. I. (2016). Soft and hard governing tools. In e. C. Ansell and J. Torfing,, Handbook on Theories of Governance. (pp. 267-278). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548508.00033
Borrás, S., & Conzelmann, T. (2007). Democracy, Legitimacy and Soft Modes of Governance in the EU: The Empirical Turn. Journal of European Integration 29(5), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701694865
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
Capano, G., & Lippi, A. (2016). How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices. policy sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9267-8
Charron, N. (2021). Measuring the unmeasurable? Taking stock of QoG measures. In The Oxford Handbook of the Quality of Government (pp. 93-114). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198858218.013.6
Dong, L. (2015). Public Administration Theories Instrumental and Value Rationalities. 1st Edition, New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN 
Egeberg, M., Gornitzka, Å., & Trondal, J. (2022). Organization theory. In hand book on theories of governance (pp. 29-42). edward elgar.
Elhauge, E. (2008). Statutory default rules: how to interpret unclear legislation. Harvard University Press.
Fani, A., Ghorbanloo, M., Danaei Fard, H., & Delkhah, J. (1396). Designing a framework for choosing a mix of public policy tools under study: Education. Public administration perspective, 41-64. doi:https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22516069.1396.8.4.2.6
Gash, A. (2022). Collaborative governance. In handbook on theories of governance (pp. 497-509). edward elgar.
Gersen, J. E., & Posner, E. A. (2008). Soft Law: Lessons from Congressional Practice. Stanford Law Review, 573-627.  http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40379694
Grazianoa, P. R., & Halpernb, C. (2015). EU governance in times of crisis: Inclusiveness and effectiveness beyond the ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law divide. Comparative European Politics, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.6
Ghorbaizadeh, v., Motazedian, R., Hoseinpoor, d., & Rahbar, A. (2021). Designing a Public Participation Pattern in Policy Making with a Multi-Method Approach. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 11(39), 68-92. [Link] 
Héritier, A. (2002). New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy-Making without Legislating? Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, , 185-206. [Link]
Hikka, S., & Christopher, P. (1997). Trajectories of reform: Public management change in four countries. public money and management, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00051
Hood, C. (1983). The Tools of Government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17169-9
Hosseinpour, D., Abdolhosseinzadeh, M., Aslipour, H., & Ghrbanizadeh, V. (1401). Visualize the Dimensions and Characteristics of Policy instrument and Provide policy Recommendations to Improve the national policy system . Strategic Studies of Public Policy , 2-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.22034/sspp.2022.251746
Howlett, M. (2011). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. London and New York: Routledge. 
Howlett, M. (2017). "Chapter 6: Policy tools and their role in policy formulation: dealing with procedural and substantive instruments". In Handbook of Policy Formulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved Apr 25, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719326.00012 
Jones, B. D. (2001). Politics and the architecture of choice: Bounded rationality and governance. University of Chicago Press.
Kamali, Y. (1396). THE METHODOLOGY OF META SYNTHESIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY. 721-736. doi:10.22059/jpq.2017.62861
Kenis, P. (2022). Network. In handbook on theories of governance (pp. 149-157). edward elgar.
Le Galès, P. (2011). Policy instruments and governance. In The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 142-159). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lowens, E. (2023). Free-baiting: policy applications for freeness removal and the zero price effect. Behavioural Public Policy, 7(2), 518-531. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556904
Maggetti, M. (2015). Hard and Soft Governance. In K. L. al, Research Methods in European Union Studies (pp. 252-265). http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137316967_16
Maher, I. (2021). Revisiting soft law. governance, regulation and networks." EU Soft Law in the Member States: Theoretical Findings and Empirical Evidence. Hart Publishing, Oxford.
Mattila, H., & Heinilä, A. (2022). Soft spaces, soft planning, soft law: Examining the institutionalisation of city-regional planning in Finland. Land Use Policy, 106-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106156
McDonnell, L. M. (1987). Getting the Job Done: Alternative Policy Instruments.. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,, 133-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163726
Nahari, G., & Ben‐Shakhar, G. (2011). Psychophysiological and behavioral measures for detecting concealed information: The role of memory for crime details. Psychophysiology, 48(6), 733-744. [Link] 
O'hagan, E. M. (2004). Too soft to handle? A reflection on soft law in Europe and accession states. Journal of European Integration 26.4, 379-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0703633042000306535
Olejniczak, K., Śliwowski, P. & Leeuw, F. (2020) Comparing Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools: Framework for Policy Designers, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22:6, 498-520, https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1808465
Peters, A., & Pagotto, I. (2006). Soft law as a new mode of governance: a legal perspective. NEWGOV: New Modes of Governance. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1668531
Philipov, D., Liefbroer, A. C., & Klobas, J. E. (Eds.). (2015). Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Radnor, Z., Osborne, S., & Glennon, R. (2022). Public management theory. In Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 43-56). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Sandelowski, M & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing. Qualitative Research.. New York, NY, USA.: Springer,.
Senden, L. (2013). Soft Post‐Legislative Rulemaking: A Time for More Stringent Control. European Law Journal 19.1, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12013
Sene, C. (2020). Fostering the Participation of Companies in Standardization: A Soft Law Instrument to Reduce Risks–The Concept of Student Standardization Societies. In Shaping the Future Through Standardization (pp. 252-278). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2181-6.ch010
Shaffer, G., & Pollack, M. A. (2012). Hard and Soft Law: What Have We Larned?. Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper No. 12-17 , 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2044800
Shelton, D. (2000). Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270989.001.0001
Skjærseth, J. B., Stokke, O. S., & Wettestad, J. (2006). Soft Law, Hard Law, and Effective Implementation of International Environmental Norms. Global Environmental Politics 6(3), 104-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.3.104
Straßheim, H. (2020). The Rise and Spread of Behavioral Public Policy: An Opportunity for Critical Research and Self-Reflection. International Review of Public Policy, 115-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/irpp.897
Wang, F., Wang, J., & Zhang, Z. G. (2017). Strategic behavior and social optimization in a double-ended queue with gated policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 114, 264-273.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.011
Yasuda, J. (2022). Regulatory governance. In handbook on theories of governance (pp. 472-484). edward elgar.
Zamir, Eyal, Default Rules: Theoretical Foundations (March 25, 2021). Research Handbook on the Philosophy of Contract Law (Mindy Chen-Wishart and Prince Saprai eds., Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming 2022), Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper No. 21-19 .  http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829366 
Zehavi, Amos. (2012). New Governance and Policy Instruments: Are Governments Going "Soft"?. The Oxford Handbook of Governance. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0017 
Zekiri, J., & Nedelea, A. (2012). Strategies for achieving competitive advantage. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, 11(2), 63-73. [Link]