References
Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(8), 1513-1522.
Branscomb, L.M., Florida, R., )1998(. Challenges to technology policy. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy that Works. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23.
Edmondson, D. L., Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2019). The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 48(10), 103555.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research policy, 40(5), 702-713.
Haelg, L., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). The role of actors in the policy design process: Introducing design coalitions to explain policy output. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 309-347.
Hansson, L. (2020). Regulatory governance in emerging technologies: The case of autonomous vehicles in Sweden and Norway. Research in transportation economics, 83, 100967.
Hansson, L. (2011). Public procurement at the local government level. Actor roles, discretion and constraints in the implementation of public transport goals. Link¨oping studies in arts and science No. 528 (Doctoral thesis). Link¨oping University.
Hansson, L., & Holmgren, J. (2011). Bypassing public procurement regulation: A study of rationality in local decision-making. Regulation & Governance, 5(3), 368–385.
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2004). The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.
Lindberg, M. B., Markard, J., & Andersen, A. D. (2019). Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix. Research policy, 48(10), 103668.
Liu, X., Schwaag Serger, S., Tagscherer, U., & Chang, A. Y. (2017). Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?. Science and Public Policy, 44(5), 656-669.
Mohammadi, N., & Khabbazan, M. M. (2022). The Influential Mechanisms of Power Actor Groups on Policy Mix Adoption: Lessons Learned from Feed-In Tariffs in the Renewable Energy Transition in Iran and Germany. Sustainability, 14(7), 3973.
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2000). Numbers, quality, and entry: How has the Bayh-Dole Act affected US university patenting and licensing?. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1, 187-220.
Reichardt, K., & Rogge, K. (2016). How the policy mix impacts innovation: Findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 62-81.
Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620-1635.
Smith, K., )1994(. New directions in research and technology policy: identifying the key issues. STEP Report R-01, STEP Group, Oslo, ISSN 0804-8185.
Wilts, H., & O’Brien, M. (2019). A policy mix for resource efficiency in the EU: key instruments, challenges and research needs. Ecological economics, 155, 59-69.
Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(8), 1513-1522.
Branscomb, L.M., Florida, R., )1998(. Challenges to technology policy. Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy that Works. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23.
Edmondson, D. L., Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2019). The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 48(10), 103555.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research policy, 40(5), 702-713.
Haelg, L., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). The role of actors in the policy design process: Introducing design coalitions to explain policy output. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 309-347.
Hansson, L. (2020). Regulatory governance in emerging technologies: The case of autonomous vehicles in Sweden and Norway. Research in transportation economics, 83, 100967.
Hansson, L. (2011). Public procurement at the local government level. Actor roles, discretion and constraints in the implementation of public transport goals. Link¨oping studies in arts and science No. 528 
Hansson, L., & Holmgren, J. (2011). Bypassing public procurement regulation: A study of rationality in local decision-making. Regulation & Governance, 5(3), 368–385.
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2004). The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.
Lindberg, M. B., Markard, J., & Andersen, A. D. (2019). Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix. Research policy, 48(10), 103668.
Liu, X., Schwaag Serger, S., Tagscherer, U., & Chang, A. Y. (2017). Beyond catch-up—can a new innovation policy help China overcome the middle income trap?. Science and Public Policy, 44(5), 656-669.
Mohammadi, N., & Khabbazan, M. M. (2022). The Influential Mechanisms of Power Actor Groups on Policy Mix Adoption: Lessons Learned from Feed-In Tariffs in the Renewable Energy Transition in Iran and Germany. Sustainability, 14(7), 3973.
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2000). Numbers, quality, and entry: How has the Bayh-Dole Act affected US university patenting and licensing?. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1, 187-220.
Reichardt, K., & Rogge, K. (2016). How the policy mix impacts innovation: Findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 62-81.
Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620-1635.
Smith, K., )1994(. New directions in research and technology policy: identifying the key issues. STEP Report R-01, STEP Group, Oslo, ISSN 0804-8185.
Wilts, H., & O’Brien, M. (2019). A policy mix for resource efficiency in the EU: key instruments, challenges and research needs. Ecological economics, 155, 59-69.