Strategic Studies of public policy

Strategic Studies of public policy

A Review of Science and Research Funding: Structures and Mechanisms

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Researcher at Sharif Policy Research Institute (SPRI), Sharif University of Technology
2 Postdoctoral researcher at Sharif Policy Research Institute (SPRI), Sharif University of Technology
3 Sharif Policy Research Institute (SPRI), Sharif University of Technology
Abstract
Abstract

Research funding through various structures and mechanisms directly impacts the performance of funding systems and scientific outputs. This study was conducted between April 2024 and March 2025. Different approaches to research funding exert distinct effects on the research and development process, potentially strengthening or weakening specific components of the research system. Awareness of these approaches enables policymakers to allocate financial resources optimally based on the country's priority needs and to enhance research productivity. The experience of the past three decades (study period: 1990–2023) in different countries shows that policymakers can draw on these experiences to design more optimal research funding structures. In this study, research funding structures in Austria, Sweden, France, the United States, and Switzerland were analyzed and compared using a literature review method. The findings indicate that while similarities exist, the structures and methods of research funding are highly diverse. Broadly speaking, research funding structures can be categorized into five types: institutional funding, project-based funding, disciplinary group funding, individual funding, and infrastructure funding. Research funding, beyond resource allocation, serves as a policy tool to steer scientific priorities and elevate the research standing of nations. A balanced selection of approaches and mechanisms can enhance scientific productivity and international competitiveness. Thus, designing multilayered funding systems that complementarily integrate diverse approaches is essential for achieving an efficient and sustainable research system.
Keywords
Subjects

منابع فارسی
احتشام نژاد، ا.، پاکزاد بناب، م.، رمضانی، م. (1403). ‹ارائه چارچوبی برای نحوه تامین مالی آموزش عالی ایران بر اساس مطالعه الگوهای جهانی’، پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی، 17(66)، صص. 145-178. 
doi: 10.22111/jmr.2024.47134.6112
پورطالعی، ف.، آتشک، م.. (1388). ‹ارائه روشی برای بودجه‌بندی دستگاه‌های پژوهشی و فناوری بر مبنای قیمت تمام شده تولیدات علم و فناوری’، سیاست علم و فناوری، 3(1)، صص. 53-65.
خراسانی، م.، علیزاده، پ.، و شاهمرادی، ب. (1404). چالش‏های ساختاری و سیاستی نظام تأمین مالی پژوهش و فناوری در ایران. مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی، 15(56)، e734398. 
doi.org/10.22034/sspp.2026.2078449.3870
علیزاده، پ. (1401). بررسی چالش‏های تأمین مالی مؤسسات پژوهشی دولتی در ایران. سیاست علم و فناوری، 15(4)، 1–19.
doi.org/10.22034/jstp.2023.11155.1570
علیزاده پ.، شجاعی، م. ح. (1401). ‹شناسایی و تحلیل گزینه‌های سیاستی برای بهبود ساختار قانون بودجه در بخش اعتبارات عمومی تحقیق ‏وتوسعه’، مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی، 12(44)، صص. 24-48.
 doi: 10.22034/sspp.2022.546471.3115 
معاونت علمی و فناوری و اقتصاد دانش‌بنیان ریاست جمهوری. (1404). علم، فناوری و نوآوری در ایران: مروری کوتاه. تهران.
نقی زاده، ر. (1402). ‹الزامات سیاستی جهت پیاده سازی سازوکارهای پرداخت پژوهانه به دانشجویان دکترا به‌عنوان پژوهشگران تمام‌وقت’، مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی، 13(47)، صص. 25-2.
 doi: 10.22034/sspp.2023.563521.3304
Refrences
Aagaard, K., Mongeon, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., Thomas, D.A., 2021. Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. PLOS ONE 16, e0251488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251488
Amanatidou, E., & Cox, D. (2023). ERA-LEARN: Enabling systematic interaction with the P2P community. Country report: France (Deliverable D5.3). ERA-LEARN. Retrieved from https://www.era-learn.eu
Austrian Science Fund. (2023). The Austrian Science Fund (FWF) in the international context. Retrieved from: https://www.fwf.ac.at/fileadmin/Website/Dokumente/Ueber_uns/Aufgaben_und_Aktivitaeten/FWF_international_strategy_2023.pdf
Borlaug, S. B. (2016). Moral hazard and adverse selection in research funding: Centres of excellence in Norway and Sweden. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 352-362.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.‏
Cocos, M. (2020). Policy hybridization: Continuity and change in Swedish research funding. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 24(4), 71-95.
Dinges, M. (2005). The Austrian Science Fund: Ex-post evaluation and performance of FWF funded research projects.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research, & Swiss Science Council. (2022). Evaluation of the Swiss National Science Foundation: Annexes V–VIII. Retrieved from: https://s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com/swr-cms/d/assets/legacy/stories/pdf/en/SWR_2022_SNF_evaluation_annexe_V-VIII.pdf
Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research, Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology, & Federal Ministry of Labour and Economy. (2024). Austrian research and technology report 2024. Retrieved from: https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/dam/jcr:82c8dd30-c0c4-489d-99e9-2ecd916d8a23/FTB2024_EN_bf.pdf
French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation. (2022). French national strategy on research infrastructures: Edition 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2023-02/french-national-strategy-on-research-infrastructures---2021-26489.pdf
French National Research Agency. (2022). The ANR funds research in its diversity: 2022 Annual Report. Retrieved from: https://anr.fr/fileadmin/documents/2024/ANR-Annual-Report-2023.pdf
French National Research Agency. (2024). 2025 work programme (Version 1.0). French National Research Agency. Retrieved from: https://anr.fr/fileadmin/documents/2024/ANR-PA-2025-en.pdf
Furrer, P. (2019). Swiss national open science strategy. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18320.53761
Harris, L. (2021). The National Science Foundation: An Overview (CRS Report No. R46753). Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46753
Janger, J., Hofmann, K., & Schmidt-Padickakudy, N. (2022). Differences in basic research grant funding: A comparison of nine research funding organisations. Austrian Institute of Economic Research. Commissioned by Swiss Science Council. Retrieved from: https://www.wifo.ac.at/publication/47970/
Janger, J., Schmidt, N., & Strauss, A. (2019). International differences in basic research grant funding-a systematic comparison (No. 9-2019). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32565.93922
Lepori, B. (2011). Coordination modes in public funding systems. Research Policy, 40(3), 355-367.
Lepori, B., & Reale, E. (2019). The changing governance of research systems. Agencification and organizational differentiation in research funding organizations. Handbook on Science and Public Policy, 448.
Lepori, B., Van den Besselaar, P., Dinges, M., Potì, B., Reale, E., Slipersæter, S., ... & Van der Meulen, B. (2007). Comparing the evolution of national research policies: What patterns of change? Science and Public Policy, 34(6), 372-388.
Lepori, B., Jongbloed, B., Hicks, D., 2023. Introduction to the Handbook of Public Funding of Research: understanding vertical and horizontal complexities, in: Handbook of Public Funding of Research. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–19.
Ministry of Education and Research. (2019). Swedish national roadmap for the European Research Area 2019–2020. Retrieved from: https://era.gv.at/public/documents/4116/swedish-national-roadmap-for-era-2019-2020.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Effective operation of competitive research funding systems. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). More than just a go-between: The role of intermediary organizations in research funding. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/12/more-than-just-a-go-between_0c51697d/aa29cfd3-en.pdf
Swiss National Science Foundation. (2016). Funding regulations: Regulations of the Swiss National Science Foundation on research grants (Version 01.01.2016). Swiss National Science Foundation. Retrieved from: https://www.snf.ch/en
Swiss National Science Foundation. (2023). General implementation regulations for the funding regulations (Version 1.11.2023). Swiss National Science Foundation. Retrieved from: https://www.snsf.ch
Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation. (2018). Switzerland’s international strategy on education, research and innovation: Strategy of the Federal Council, July 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.sbfi.admin.ch/bfi-int_e
Thèves, J., Lepori, B., & Larédo, P. (2007). Changing patterns of public research funding in France. Science and Public Policy, 34(6), 389-399.
UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Science Report 2021: Iran. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
World Bank. (2025). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP): Iran, Islamic Republic. Retrieved April 22, 2026, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=IR