Analysis of the functions of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in the national innovation system; A mixed research

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Member, Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Farabi Faculties, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.

3 Researcher, Institute for Science and Technology Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The Ministry of Science, Research and Technology and its subordinate actors, as one of the crucial sub-systems in the national innovation system, play a vital role in the structure, functions, and performance of the national innovation system. In this regard, the current research was conducted with the aim of identifying and prioritizing the functions and sub-functions of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology in the national innovation system. In terms of methodology, this research is mixed research that has benefited from thematic analysis in the qualitative part and importance-performance analysis in the quantitative part. In the qualitative part, the review of international documents, laws and regulations, and upstream documents and the analysis of data related to focus groups with different stakeholders led to the preparation of a list of 60 sub-functions under the 7 main functions of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology. Then, to achieve the priority sub-functions of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology, the importance-performance questionnaire was sent to universities, research institutes, and science and technology parks, and 33 completed questionnaires were collected. Based on the importance-performance analysis, 40 sub-functions were selected as priority sub-functions (low performance and high importance) of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. Identifying the priority sub-functions of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology can be a basis for a more accurate functional and performance analysis and formulation of policies and programs in order to strengthen the role of this Ministry in the national innovation system.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

References
Abbasi, T., Fard, H. D., Azar, A., & Alvani, M. (2010). [Explaining policy change using Kingdon’s Multiple Streams, the law of the Duties and Organization of Iran’s Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (Persian)]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 3(1), 82-98. [Link]
Abasi, T., Gholipour, R., & Hadi, M. (2018). [Identifying facilitators to make evidence-based policy the science, research and technology area (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 8(26), 65-84. [Link]
Alizadeh, P., Safdari Ranjbar, M., & Mohajeri, A. (2023). [Designing a policy mix to strengthen the role of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in national innovation system (Persian)]. Journal of Improvement Management, 17(2), 88-114. [Link]
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. [DOI:10.1177/146879410100100307]
Azar, A., Khisravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2019). [Research in soft operations (Persian)]. Tehran: Industrial Management Institute.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). “Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis”. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003]
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Hekkert, M., & Smith, K. (2010). Functionality of innovation systems as a rationale for and guide to innovation policy. In: R.E. Smits, S. Kuhlmann , & P. Shapira (Eds.), The theory and practice of innovation policy: An international research handbook. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. [DOI:10.4337/9781849804424.00013]
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. California: Sage. [Link]
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
Danaeefard, H. (2017). [Strategies of theory building (Persian)]. Tehran: SAMT. [Link]
Edquist, Ch. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In: J.Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery,  & R. Nelson (Eds). Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Link]
Farazkish, M., & Nasri, S. (2022). [Analysis of the realization of the quantitative goals of research and technology in the sixth five-year program of economic, social and cultural development (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of public policy, 12(44), 214-236. [Link]
Fetanat Fard Haghgighi, M., Zeinabadi, H. R., Arasteh, H., & Nave Ebrahim, A. (2021). [Designing a model of governance in higher education (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 11(38), 324-346. [Link]
Ghazinoory, S., & Farazkish, M. (2018). [A modal for STI national evaluation based efficiency, effectiveness and Utility index (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of public policy, 8(27), 205-229. [Link]
Haghighi, B. P., Karimi, T., Safdari, R. M., & Jafari, S. M. (2023). [Providing the framework of knowledge functions and actors of the national innovation system, Systematic synthesis of research (Persian)]. Organizational Knowledge Management, 6(1), 61-106. [Link]
Heirani, H. (2018). [A review of the technology innovation system and its analysis (Persian)]. The Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters, 8(2), 43-58. [Link]
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., &” Smits, R. E. (2007). “Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413-432. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002]
Hesabi, F., & Kheradmandnia, S. (2022). [In the path of knowledge-based and job-creating production: Institutional pathology of science and technology commercialization system in the country (Persian)]. Tehran: Islamic Parliament Research Center of The Islamic Republic of Iran. [Link]
Heshmati, A., & Dibaji, S. M. (2019). Science, technology, and innovation status in Iran: Main challenges. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 545-578. [DOI:10.1177/0971721819873192]
Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2011). “Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research”. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 41-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.006]
Kebede, K. Y., & Mitsufuji, T. (2017). Technological innovation system building for diffusion of renewable energy technology: A case of solar PV systems in Ethiopia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 242-253. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.018]
Kosari, S. (2019). [Vision of higher education system functions with regional management approach (Persian)]. Rahyaft, 29(3), 1-18. [Link]
Kosari, S., & Ahmadi, H. (2020). [Analysis of internal and external governance of higher education system in Iran (Persian)]. Public Organization Management, 8(4), 125-144. [Link]
Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems-analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95-119. [DOI:10.1080/13662710601130863]
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. [DOI:10.2307/1250495]
OECD . (2011). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Russian Federation 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Link]
OECD . (2016). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Sweden 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Link]
OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China 2008. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Link]
OECD. (2014). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Industry and technology policies in Korea. Paris: OECD Publishing. [DOI:10.1787/9789264213227-en]
OECD. (2017). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Norway 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. [DOI:10.1787/9789264277960-en]
OECD. (2019). OECD review of higher education, research and innovation: Portugal. Paris: OECD Publishing. [DOI:10.1787/9789264308138-en]
OECD. (2021). Mission-oriented innovation policy in Japan: Challenges, opportunities and future options. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Link]
OECD. (2021). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Kuwait 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Link]
OECD. (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Link]
Radayi, N. (2021). [Research, technology and innovation in the seventh development plan (Persian)]. Tehran: National Research Institute for Science Policy. [Link]
Soltanzadeh, J., Khayyatian, S., & Habibdoust, A. (2023). [Explaining the functions of Free Economic Zones in the Iranian innovation system and knowledge-based economics (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 12(45), 8-27. [Link]
UNCTAD . (2015). Science, technology and innovation policy review: Thailand. Geneva: UNCTAD Publishing. [Link]
UNCTAD. (2016). Science, technology and innovation policy review: Iran. Geneva: UNCTAD Publishing. [Link]
UNESCO . (2020). Mapping research and innovation in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. [Link]
Wieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2021). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy, 39(1), 74-87. [DOI:10.1093/scipol/scr008]
Strategic Studies of public policy
Volume 13, Issue 48
November 2023
Pages 142-170

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics