Refrences
Andersson, E., Jansson, B. and Lundblad, J. (2013), “Immanuel Kant Revisited - A Note on the U.S. Innovation Policy”, International Journal of Innovation Science, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 137-142. https://doi.org/10.1260/1757-2223.5.3.137.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 77-101.
 Burmaoglu, Serhat & Sartenaer, Olivier & Porter, Alan. (2019). “Conceptual definition of technology emergence: A long journey from philosophy of science to science policy,” Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
Chatzinikolaou, D. (2025). On Smart Cities and Triple-Helix Intermediaries: A Critical-Realist Perspective. Smart Cities, 8(3), 74.
Cohen, E. (2004). Science, democracy, and stem cells. Philosophy Today, 48, 23.
Dosi, Giovanni. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy. 11, 3. 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
Fragkandreas, T. (2025). Case study research on innovation systems: Paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution. Research Policy, 54(1), 105136.
Fritsch, S. (2025). Classical Political Economy and the Power of Technology: Adam Smith and Thorstein Veblen on Technological Ambivalence. Philosophy & Technology, 38(4), 135.
Frodeman, R., Briggle, A., Fisher, E., & Ryen, S. (2004). Prolegomenon to a future humanities policy. Philosophy Today, 48, 30.
Geels, F. W. (2022). Causality and explanation in socio-technical transitions research: Mobilising epistemological insights from the wider social sciences. Research policy, 51(6), 104537.
Ghazinoory, S., Ranjbar, A., & Fatemi, M. (2025). Developing a maturity model to evaluate innovation policy across generations. International Journal of Innovation Science, 1-25.
Gross, M., Krohn, W. (2004). Science in a Real-World Context: Constructing Knowledge Through Recursive Learning. Toward a Philosophy of Science Policy: Approaches and Issues, 48, 38.
Grunwald, A. (2020). The objects of technology assessment. Hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 96-112.
Grunwald, A. (2019). The inherently democratic nature of technology assessment. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 702-709.
Gómez, A. V. (2004). Toward a political philosophy of science. Philosophy Today, 48, 116.
Gusenbauer, M., & Gauster, S. P. (2025). How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 212, 123833.
Holbrook, J. B. (2005). Assessing the science–society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation’s second merit review criterion. Technology in society, 27(4), 437-451.
Kitcher, P. (2004). On the autonomy of the sciences. Philosophy Today, 48, 51.
Kristensson Uggla, B. (2017). The Hermeneutics of Creativity and Innovation in Knowledge Society - Between Structuralism and Pragmatism. Philosophy of Management, 16(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0069-7
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. Elsevier publishing company.
Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research policy, 41(7), 1219-1239.
Mitcham, C., & Frodeman, R. (2004). New Directions in the Philosophy of Science: Toward a Philosophy of Science Policy. Philosophy Today, 48(Supplement), 3-15.
Moussavi, A., Kermanshah, A. (2018). Innovation Systems Approach: a Philosophical Appraisal. Philosophy of Management 17, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-017-0078-6.
Nelson, R. (2016). “The sciences are different and the differences matter,” Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1692-1701.
Nickles, T. (2009). Life at the frontier: The relevance of heuristic appraisal to policy. Axiomathes, 19(4), 441-464.
Ottinger, G. (2023). Responsible epistemic innovation: How combatting epistemic injustice advances responsible innovation (and vice versa). Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10(1), 2054306.
Possati, L. M. (2024). Quantum technologies: a hermeneutic technology assessment approach. NanoEthics, 18(1), 2.
Rooney, D., & Mckenna, B. (2005). Should the knowledge‐based economy be a savant or a sage? Wisdom and socially intelligent innovation. Prometheus, 23(3), 307-323.
Sarewitz, D., Foladori, G., Invernizzi, N., & Garfinkel, M. S. (2004). Science policy in its social context. Philosophy today, 48(Supplement), 67-83.
Sand, M. (2019). On “not having a future”. Futures. 107. 98–106
Schmidt, J. C. (2007, October). Normativity and Innovation: An approach to concepts of innovation from the perspective of philosophy of technology. In 2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (pp. 1-8). IEEE
Schot, Johan & Steinmueller, W. Edward. (2018). “Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change,” Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1554-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
Shaw, A., & Robinson, J. (2004). Relevant but not prescriptive: science policy models within the IPCC. Philosophy today, 48(Supplement), 84-95.
Shrader-Frechette, K. (2004). Models in panther biology and radiobiology: Philosophy of science as scientific citizenship. Philosophy Today, 48, 96.
Soete, L. (2019). Science, technology and innovation studies at a crossroad: SPRU as case study. Research Policy, 48(4), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.029
Sorrell, Steve. (2018). “Explaining sociotechnical transitions: A critical realist perspective,” Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1267-1282.
Svensson, O., & Nikoleris, A. (2018). Structure reconsidered: Towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory. Research Policy, 47(2), 462-473.
Tuana, N. (2010). Leading with ethics, aiming for policy: New opportunities for philosophy of science. Synthese, 177(3), 471-492.
Villalobos, Pablo Ayala. (2024). Bridging Empirical Evidence and Diverse Epistemologies in Public Policy: Evidence-Based Policy and the Issue of Subjugated Knowledges. Qeios. doi:10.32388/07SYNE.
Viola, E. (2009). “Once Upon a Time” Philosophy of Science: STS, Science Policy and the Semantic View of Scientific Theories. Axiomathes, 19(4), 465-480.
Whitley, Richard. (2016).  “Varieties of scientific knowledge and their contributions to dealing with policy problems: A response to Richard Nelson’s “The sciences are different and the differences matter”,” Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1702-1707.