منابع فارسی
تبریزی، م. (3931). تحلیل محتوای کیفی از منظر رویکردهای قیاسی و استقرایی. فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، 21 (46)، 831-501.
جهانیان، ش. و اسلامی، س. (9931). بررسی مقایسهای استراتژیهای امنیت ملی آمریکا در قرن بیست و یکم. فصلنامه مطالعات راهبردی، 32 (78)، 871-351.
رضاخواه، ع. ر. و آقاحسینی، ع. ر. (7931). گونهشناسی قدرت نرم آمریکا با تأکید بر مؤلفه استثناگرایی آمریکایی. دو فصلنامه پژوهشی قدرت نرم، 8 (2)، 89-96.
شریفزاده، ز. (8931). استثناگرایی در سیاست خارجی.
طیبی ابوالحسنی، ا. ح. (8931). درآمدی بر روش تحقیق: رویههای استاندارد تحلیل دادههای کیفی. سیاستنامه علم و فناوری، 09 (2)، 67-96.
کاردان، ع. (0931). کتاب آمریکا (01) (ویژه بررسی اسناد استراتژی امنیت ملی آمریکا پس از جنگ سرد). تهران: ابرار معاصر تهران.
.مطلبی، م. و فلاح نژاد، ع. (2931). هویتهای سیاست خارجی آمریکا و دولت باراک اوباما. فصلنامه تحقیقات سیاسی و بینالمللی، 5 (71)، 671-541.
مؤمنی راد، ا.، علیآبادی، خ.، فردانش، ه. و مزینی، ن. (2931). تحلیل محتوای کیفی در آیین پژوهش: ماهیت، مراحل و اعتبار نتایج. فصلنامه اندازهگیری تربیتی، 4 (41)، 222-781.
References
Department of Defense. (2018). Summary of the National Defense Strategy of the United States of America.Retrived from: https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2018_NDS.pdf
The Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2018). National Military Strategy 2018. Washington: The Joint Staff. https://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/UNCLASS_2018_National_Military_Strategy_Description-1.pdf
National Security Strategy. (2017). National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Retrived from: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
Cancian, M., Schaus, J., & Dalton, M. (2017). Formulating national security strategy: Past experience and future choices. Washington, D.C: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). https://www.google.com/books/edition/Formulating_National_Security_Strategy/D0GTswEACAAJ?hl=en
Dale, C. (2008). National security strategy: Legislative mandates, execution to date, and considerations for congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20080923_RL34505_8df73677803f451693f513d676ba9ed25d9016ad.pdf
Congressional Research Service. (2013). National security strategy: Mandates, execution to date, and issues for congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20130806_R43174_492d2b2757364eac05e879c0f0ef2e153ef9ac64.pdf
Encina, C. G. (2018). The Trump administration’s national security strategy. Madrid: The Elcano Royal Institute. http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_en/contenido?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/elcano/elcano_in/zonas_in/usa-transatlantic+dialogue/wp14-2018-garciaencina-trump-administration-national-security-strategy
Finkel, M. (2020). IDF strategy documents, 2002-2018: On processes, chiefs of staff, and the IDF. A Multidisciplinary Journal on National Security, 23(4), 4-17. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Strategic-Assessment/publication/346080614_Strategic_Assessment_-_No_4_Volume_23_October_2020/links/5fba3e0a92851c933f4e013b/Strategic-Assessment-No-4-Volume-23-October-2020.pdf#page=5
Oler, A., Tretler, D., & Heffington, S. (2019). A national security strategy primer. Washington, D.C: National Defense University Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_National_Security_Strategy_Primer/pBd7zQEACAAJ?hl=en
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. [DOI:10.1177/1049732305276687]
Layne, C. (1997). From preponderance to offshore balancing: America’s future grand strategy in international security. International Security, 22(1), 86-124. [DOI:10.2307/2539331]
Raik, K., Aaltola, M., Kallio, J., & Pynnöniemi, K. (2018). The security strategies of the US, China, Russia and the EU: Living in different worlds. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs. https://www.fiia.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/fiia_report56_web_security-strategies.pdf
Tabrizi, M. (2014). [Qualitative content analysis from the perspective of deductive and inductive approaches (Persian)]. Quarterly Journal of Social Sciences, 21(64), 105-138. [DOI:10.22054/QJSS.2014.344]
National Defense Strategy Commission. (2018). Providing for the common defense: The assessment and recommendations of the National Defense Strategy Commission. Washington, D.C: United States Institute of Peace. https://www.usip.org/publications/2018/11/providing-common-defense
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Random House. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Theory_of_International_Politics/Ey25AAAAIAAJ?hl=en
Jahanian, S., & Eslami, S. (2020). [A review of US national security strategies in the 21st Century (with emphasis on the Trump administration) (Persian)]. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 23(87), 153-178. http://quarterly.risstudies.org/article_110723.html?lang=fa
Rezakhah, A. R., & Aghahosseini, A. R. (2019). [Typology of the US soft power with an emphasis on “American exceptionalism” (Persian)]. Soft power Studies, 8(2), 69-98. http://www.spba.ir/article_99338.html?lang=fa
Sharifzadeh, Z. (2019). [Exceptionalism in foreign policy (Persian)]. Retrived from: http://iirjournal.net/fa/%D9%85%D9%81%D8%A7%D9%87%DB%8C%D %8C.html
Tayebi Abolhasani, A. H. (2019). [Introduction to research methodology: Standard procedures for qualitative data analysis (Persian)]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters, 09(2), 67-96. [DOI:20.1001.1.24767220.1398.09.2.5.1]
Kardan, A. (2011). [ Book of America (10) (special review of US national security strategy documents after the Cold War) (Persian)]. Tehran: Abrare-Moaser. http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/search/briefListSearch.do?command=FULL_VIEW&id=2320101&pageStatus=1&sortKeyValue1=sortkey_title&sortKeyValue2=sortkey_author
Motallebi, M., & Fallahnejad, A. (2013). [Umited States foreign policy identites and Barak Obama Administration (Persian)]. Political and International Scientific and Research Quarterly, 5(17), 145-176. http://pir.iaush.ac.ir/article_552258.html?lang=en
Momeni Rad, A., Aliabadi, K., Faardanesh, H., & Mazini, N. (2013). [Qualitative content analysis in research tradition: Nature, stages and validity of the results (Persian)].
Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 4(14), 187-222.
https://jem.atu.ac.ir/article_92.html?lang=en