References
Aitsi-Selmi, A., Murray, V., Wannous, C., Dickinson, C., Johnston, D., Kawasaki, A., ... & Yeung, T. 2016. Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 7(1), 1-29.
Barker, K. 2007. The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system. Research evaluation, 16(1), 3-12. 
Brunton, G., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2020). Innovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method. Research synthesis methods, 11(3), 316-330.‏ 
Canberra Manual. 1995. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Manual on the measurement of human resources devoted to S&T. Brussels, Luxembourg.
Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Cooper, K. (2011). A worked example of” best fit” framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC medical research methodology, 11(1), 1-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-29
Chelimsky, E. (2006). The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. The Sage handbook of evaluation, 33-55. 
Chen, J., Heng, C. S., Tan, B. C., & Lin, Z. (2018). The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China. Research Policy, 47(1), 108-120.
Coryn, C. L., Hattie, J. A., Scriven, M., & Hartmann, D. J. (٢٠٠٧). Models and Mechanisms for Evaluating Government-Funded Research An International Comparison. American Journal of Evaluation, ٢٨(٤), ٤٣٧-٤٥٧.
Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2007). Research Evaluation in transition: individual versus organisational assessment in Spain. The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems, 205-223. 
European Environment Agency (2017). EEA guidance document-policy evaluation.
Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Frederiksen, L. F., Hansson, F., & Wenneberg, S. B. 2003. The Agora and the role of research evaluation. Evaluation, 9(2), 149-172.‏ 
Gasper, D. (2018), Policy Evaluation: From Managerialism and Econocracy to a Governance Perspective, in International Development Governance, Routledge.
Gibbons, M., & Georghiou, L. (1987). Evaluation of Research. A Selection of Current Practices. OECD Publications Service, Sales and Distribution Division, 2, rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris, France.
GII 2022 theme: Energizing the World with Innovation. 2022. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
Hackett, P. (1997). Introduction to training. Universities Press. 
Jordan, B. (2008). Welfare and well-being: Social value in public policy. Policy Press. 
Molas-Gallart, J. 2012. Research governance and the role of evaluation: A comparative study. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(4), 583-598.‏ 
OECD-DAC (2002). Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management, https://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/18074294.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2023).
OECD (2018). Draft Policy Framework on Sound Public Governance, http://www.oecd.org/gov/draft-policy-framework-on-sound-public-governance.pdf (accessed on 8 July 2023).
OECD Patent Statistics Manual. 2009. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Oh, D. S., & Phillips, F. (2014). Technopolis. Springer.
Oslo Manual 2005: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Smismans, S. (2015). Policy Evaluation in the EU: The Challenges of Linking Ex Ante and Ex Post Appraisal, Symposium on Policy Evaluation in the EU.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00004244.
Technology Balance of Payments (TBP) Manual. 1999. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
UNESCO Science Report 2010. The Current Status of Science around the World. Paris: UNESCO, 2010.