منابع فارسی
قمشی، م. (5931). درسهایی که باید از سرنوشت سد گتوند آموخت. مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی، 6(02)، 381-781.
خواجوی، پ. (5931). بررسی مسائل و مشکلات سیاستگذاری آب، خاک و امنیت غذایی در ایران. مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی، 6(20)، 561-081.
References
Araei, V., Ghasemi, A., & Alavian, M. (2021). [The policy-making of the forests of northern Iran as a policy wicked problem; Strategic recommendations (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of public policy, 11(39), 326-350. [Link]
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405. [DOI:10.1177/146879410100100307]
Balconi, M., Brusoni, S., & Orsenigo, L. (2010). In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy, 39(1), 1-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.013]
Boekholt, P. (2010) The evolution of innovation policy paradigms and its effects on research, technological development and innovation policy instruments. In R. E. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, & P. Shapira (Eds), The theory and practice of innovation policy (pp. 333-59). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. [Link]
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
Cantner, U., & Pyka, A. (2001). Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective. Research Policy, 30(5), 759-775. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00104-9]
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: An evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30(9), 1563-1584. [DOI:10.1068/a301563]
Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy, 48(4), 880-894. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028]
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. [DOI:10.1093/oxrep/grx001]
Edler, J., Gök, A., Cunningham, P., & Shapira, P. (2016). Introduction: Making sense of innovation policy. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, & A. Gök (Eds.), Handbook of innovation policy impact (pp. 1-17). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. [DOI:10.4337/9781784711856.00008]
Edquist, C. (2010). Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2(3), 14-45. [Link]
Ergas, H. (2009). The importance of technology policy. In P. Dasgupta, & P. Stoneman (Eds.), Economic policy and technological performance (pp. 51-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511559938.005]
Fagerberg, J. (2018). Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy, 47(9), 1568-1576. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012]
Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies-The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218-233. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006]
Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1132-1153. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008]
Fagerberg, J., Martin, B. R., & Andersen, E. S. (2013). Innovation studies: Towards a new agenda. In J. Fagerberg, B. R. Martin, & E. S. Anderson (Eds.), Innovation studies: Evolution and future challenges (pp. 1-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press University Press [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199686346.001.0001]
Foray, D., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2012). Public R&D; and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D; programs? Research Policy, 41(10), 1697-1702. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011]
Gassler, H., Polt, W., & Rammer, C. (2007). Priority setting in research & technology policy-historical developments and recent trends. Vienna: Joanneum Research. [Link]
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8]
Ghazinoory, S., Nasri, S., Ameri, F., Montazer, G. A., & Shayan, A. (2020). Why do we need ‘Problem-oriented Innovation System (PIS)’for solving macro-level societal problems? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119749. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119749]
Ghazinoory, S., Narimani, M., & Tatina, S. (2017). Neoclassical versus evolutionary economics in developing countries: Convergence of policy implications. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(3), 555-583. [DOI:10.1007/s00191-017-0490-z]
Gohari, A., Eslamian, S., Mirchi, A., Abedi-Koupaei, J., Bavani, A. M., & Madani, K. (2013). Water transfer as a solution to water shortage: A fix that can backfire. Journal of Hydrology, 491, 23-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.021]
Jänicke, M. (1985). Preventive environmental policy as ecological modernisation and structural policy. Berlin: Internationales Institut für Umwelt und Gesellschaft des Wissentschaftszentrums.
Kashani, E. S., & Roshani, S. (2019). Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 68-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.010]
Kemp, R., Schot, J., Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175-198. [DOI:10.1080/09537329808524310]
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., & Wieczorek, A. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004]
Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (2006). Science, technology and innovation policy. In J. Fagerberg, & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 599-631). Oxford: Oxford Academic [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0022]
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013]
Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41(7), 1219-1239. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012]
Mazzucato, M. (2015). Innovation systems: From fixing market failures to creating markets. Revista do Serviço Público, 66(4), 627-640. [DOI:10.21874/rsp.v66i4.1303]
Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. [DOI:10.1093/icc/dty034]
Miremadi, T. (2019). [The emerging trends of STI Policy (Persian)]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(2), 619-633.[Link]
Nelson, R. R. (1985). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. [Link]
Pack, H., & Saggi, K. (2006). Is there a case for industrial policy? A critical survey. The World Bank Research Observer, 21(2), 267-297. [DOI:10.1093/wbro/lkl001]
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73, 5. [Link]
Robinson, D. K., & Mazzucato, M. (2019). The evolution of mission-oriented policies: Exploring changing market creating policies in the US and European space sector. Research Policy, 48(4), 936-948. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005]
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011]
Shokatian, T., & Ghazinoory, S. (2019). [Challenges of policy making in the realm of basic research (Persian)]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 11(2), 347-361. [Link]
Smith, A. (2005). The alternative technology movement: An analysis of its framing and negotiation of technology development. Human Ecology Review, 12(2), 106-119. [Link]
Smith, A., Voß, J. P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435-448. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023]
Tindemans, P. ( 2009). Post-war research, education and innovation policy-making Europe. In L. Soete, H. Delanghe, & U. Muldur (Eds.), European science and technology policy: Towards integration or fragmentation? (pp. 3-24). Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.[Link]
Tunzelmann, N. V., Malerba, F., Nightingale, P., & Metcalfe, S. (2008). Technological paradigms: Past, present and future. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(3), 467-484. [DOI:10.1093/icc/dtn012]
Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015]
Ghomshi, M. (2016). [Lessons that should be learned from the fate of Ghotvand (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of Public Policy , 6(20), 183-187. [Link]
Khajoy, P. (2016). [Investigating issues and problems of water, soil and food security policy in Iran (Persian)]. Strategic Studies of Public Policy , 6(20), 165-180. [Link]
)