احمدیان دیوکتی، م. م.، آقاجانی، ح. ع.، شیرخدایی، م.، و طهرانچیان، ا. (7931). طراحی مدل سیاستگذاری علم و فناوری مبتنی بر رویکرد پیچیدگی اقتصادی. فصلنامه سیاستگذاری عمومی،4(4)، 72-9.
جوریان، ن.، سیاوشی، ا.، نوری، ج.، و عباسی، م. (6931). شناسایی ابزارهای سیاستی تقاضامحور و جانمایی آنها در مراحل چرخه عمر محصول. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 5 (3)،82-61.
جعفری‌نژاد، ن.، مقبل با عرض، ع.، و آذر، ع. (3931). شناسایی و استخراج مؤلفه‌های اصلی مدیریت ریسک سازمان با استفاده از روش فراترکیب. چشم‌انداز مدیریت صنعتی، 4(3) ، 701-58.
کمالی، ی. (6931). روش‌شناسی فراترکیب و کاربرد آن در سیاستگذاری عمومی. فصلنامه سیاست، 74(3)، 127-637.
مانیان، ا.، و رونقی، م. (4931). ارائه چارچوب جامع پیاده‌سازی بازاریابی اینترنتی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب. مدیریت بازرگانی، 7(4)، 029-109.
نوروزی، ن.، الهی، ش.، حسن‌زاده، ع.، وحاجی حسینی، ح. (3931). ارائه چارچوبی از ابزارهای سیاستی علم و فناوری با استفاده از رویکرد فراترکیب. مدیریت نوآوری،2(2)، 421-301.
گودرزی، م.، علیزاده، ح. ر.، غریبی، ج.، و محسنی، م. (8931). آسیب‌شناسی سیاست‌های علم و فناوری در ایران: تحلیلی بر برنامه‌های توسعه پنج ساله. فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه فناوری، 2(3)، 161-731.
نقی‌زاده، ر.، الهی، ش.، منطقی، م.، و قاضی نوری, س. س. (3931). فراترکیب مدل‌های نوآوری منطقه‌ای مروری بر سال‌های 3102-0991. مدیریت نوآوری،3(4)، 65-52.
References
Ahmadian Divkoti, M. M., Ali Aghajani, H., Shirkhodaei, M., & Tehranchian, A. M. (2019). [Designing a model of science and technology policy making based on economic complexity approach (Persian)]. Public Policy, 4(4), 9-27. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2014.998641]
Amann, M., & Essig, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation: Empirical evidence from EU public authorities on barriers for the promotion of innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 282-92. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2014.998641]
Askfors, Y., & Fornstedt, H. (2018). The clash of managerial and professional logics in public procurement: Implications for innovation in the health-care sector. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(1), 78-90.[DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2018.01.001]
Brogaard, L. (2017). Innovation and value in pre-commercial procurement: A systematic evaluation of national experiences. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 3(3), 137-56. [DOI:10.1177/2055563618799065]
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2016). Public procurement for innovation: A novel eGovernment services scheme in Greek local authorities.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 1-10.[DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.016]
Chicot, J., & Matt, M. (2018). Public procurement of innovation: A review of rationales, designs, and contributions to grand challenges. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 480-492. [DOI:10.1093/scipol/scy012]
Dale-Clough, L. (2015). Public procurement of innovation and local authority procurement: Procurement modes and framework conditions in three European cities. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 220-42. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2015.1012709]
Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation-Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36(7), 949-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003]
Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 414-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010]
Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research Policy, 41(10), 1757-1769. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022]
Edler, J., & Uyarra, E. (2013). Public procurement of innovation. In S. P. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Handbook_of_Innovation_in_Public_Service/4SLBUewk-lcC?hl=en&gbpv=1
Edquist, Ch., Vonortas, N. S., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J., & Edler, J. (2015). Public Procurement For Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. [DOI:10.4337/9781783471898]
European Commission. (2016). International public procurement. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/public-procurement/international_en
Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., & Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 1-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.018]
Godarzi, M., Rezaalizadeh, H., Gharibi, J., & Mohseni, M. (2014). [ Pathology of science and technology policies of Iran: An analysis of the five-year development plans (Persian)]. Journal of Technology Development Management, 2(3), 137-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.018]
Haugbølle, K., Pihl, D., & Gottlieb, S. C. (2015). Competitive dialogue: Driving innovation through procurement? Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 555-62. [DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00212-9]
Hommen, L., & Rolfstam, M. (2008). Public procurement and innovation: Towards a taxonomy. Journal of Public Procurement, 8(3), 17-56. [DOI:10.1108/JOPP-08-03-2008-B001]
Iossa, E., Biagi, F., & Valbonesi, P. (2018). Pre-commercial procurement, procurement of innovative solutions and innovation partnerships in the EU: Rationale and strategy.Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(8), 730-49. [DOI:10.1080/10438599.2017.1402431]
Jafarinejad, N., Moghbel Baarz, A., & Azar, A. (2014). [Identify and extract the main dimensions of enterprise risk management based on meta-synthesis (Persian)]. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 4(3), 85-107. https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87279.html?lang=en
Jooriyan, N., Siavashi, E., Noori, J., & Abbasi, M. (2017). [Identifying demand- driven policy Instruments and locating Instruments in the stages of product life cycle (Persian)]. Journal of Technology Development Management, 5(3), 61-82 . [DOI:10.1080/10438599.2017.1402431]
Kalvet, T., & Lember, V. (2010). Risk management in public procurement for innovation: The case of Nordic-Baltic Sea cities. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(3), 241-62. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2011.553509]
Kamali, Y. (2017). [The methodology of meta synthesis and implications for public policy (Persian)]. Politics Quarterly, 47(3), 721-36. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2011.553509]
Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2010). Public procurement as an industrial policy tool: An option for developing countries? Journal of Public Procurement, 10(3), 368-404.[DOI:10.1108/JOPP-10-03-2010-B003]
Knutsson, H., & Thomasson, A. (2014). Innovation in the Public Procurement Process: A study of the creation of innovation-friendly public procurement. Public Management Review, 16(2), 242-55. [DOI:10.1080/14719037.2013.806574]
Landoni, M. (2017). Innovation policy in progress. Institutional intermediation in public procurement of innovation: Satellite telecommunications in Italy. R&D Management, 47(4), 583-94. [DOI:10.1111/radm.12246]
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2015). Quo vadis public procurement of innovation? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 403-21. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245]
Lember, V., Kalvet, T., & Kattel, R. (2011). Urban competitiveness and public procurement for innovation. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1373-95.[DOI:10.1177/0042098010374512]
Li, Y. (2017). Assessing public procurement of innovation as a cross-domain policy: A framework and application to the chinese context. Review of Policy Research, 34(3), 421-46. [DOI:10.1111/ropr.12229]
Li, Y., & Georghiou, L. (2016). Signaling and accrediting new technology: Use of procurement for innovation in China. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 338-51.[DOI:10.1093/scipol/scv044]
Manian, A., & Ronaghi, M. H. (2015). [A comprehensive framework for e-marketing implementation by meta-synthesis method (Persian)]. Journal of Business Management, 7(4), 901-20. [DOI:10.1093/scipol/scv044]
Naghizadeh, R., Elahi, S., Manteghi, M., & Ghazinoory, S. S. (2015). [The meta-synthesis of regional innovation models: A review of 1990–2013 (Persian)]. Innovation Management Journal, 3(4), 25-56. http://www.nowavari.ir/article_14737.html?lang=en
Nijboer, K., Senden, S., & Telgen, J. (2017). Cross-country learning In public procurement: An exploratory study. Journal Of Public Procurement, 17(4), 449-82 [DOI:10.1108/JOPP-17-04-2017-B001]
Norouzi, N., Elahi, S. A., Hasanzade, A., & Hajihoseini, H. (2014). [ Proposing a framework of science and technology policy instruments based on meta-synthesis approach (Persian)]. Innovation Management Journal, 3(2), 103-24. http://www.nowavari.ir/article_14720.html
Obwegeser, N., & Müller, S. D. (2018). Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications. Technovation, 74-75, 1-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.015]
Rainville, A. (2016). From whence the knowledge came: Heterogeneity of innovation procurement across Europe. Journal of Public Procurement, 16(4), 436-504. [DOI:10.1108/JOPP-16-04-2016-B003]
Rocha, F. (2018). Procurement as innovation policy and its distinguishing effects on innovative efforts of the Brazilian oil and gas suppliers. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(8), 750-69. [DOI:10.1080/10438599.2017.1408199]
Rolfstam, M. (2009). Public procurement as an innovation policy tool: The role of institutions. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 349-60. [DOI:10.3152/030234209X442025]
Rolfstam, M. (2012). An institutional approach to research on public procurement of innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(3), 303-21. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2012.717475]
Rolfstam, M. (2015). Public procurement of innovation for a better world: A consolidation or a new beginning? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 211-9. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2012.717475]
Rolfstam, M., Phillips, W., & Bakker, E. (2011). Public procurement of innovations, diffusion and endogenous institutions. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 24(5), 452-68. [DOI:10.1108/09513551111147178]
Rullan, S., Saucedo, E., & Bacaria, J. (2012). Public procurement for innovation: Challenges and prospects for Latin America. Paper presented at The International Symposium on Management of Technology (ISMOT). 8-9 November 2012; Hangzhou, China. [DOI:10.1109/ISMOT.2012.6679543]
Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1981). Industrial innovation and public policy. Connecticut: Greenwood Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Industrial_Innovation_and_Public_Policy/A2eaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en
Sánchez-Carreira, M. D. C., Peñate-Valentín, M. C., & Varela-Vázquez, P. (2019). Public procurement of innovation and regional development in peripheral areas. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 119-147. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2018.1528142]
Saastamoinen, J., Reijonen, H., & Tammi, T. (2018). Should SMEs pursue public procurement to improve innovative performance? Technovation, 69, 2-14. [DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.003]
Saastamoinen, J., Tammi, T., & Reijonen, H. (2018). E-procurement and SME involvement in public procurement of innovations: An exploratory study. International Journal of Procurement Management (IJPM), 11(4), 420-42. [DOI:10.1504/IJPM.2018.092768]
Storsjö, I. T., & Kachali, H. (2017). Public procurement for innovation and civil preparedness: A policy-practice gap.International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 342-56. [DOI:10.1108/IJPSM-10-2016-0177]
Timmermans, B., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2013). Coordinated unbundling: A way to stimulate entrepreneurship through public procurement for innovation. Science and Public Policy, 40(5), 674-685. [DOI:10.1093/scipol/sct023]
Torvinen, H., & Ulkuniemi, P. (2016). End-user engagement within innovative public procurement practices: A case study on public--private partnership procurement. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 58-68. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.015]
Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., & Yeow, J. (2014). Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation 34(10), 631-645. [DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003]
Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement. European planning studies, 18(1), 123-43. [DOI:10.1080/09654310903343567]
Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2017). Anchoring the innovation impacts of public procurement to place: The role of conversations.Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(5), 828 -48. [DOI:10.1177/2399654417694620]
Vecchiato, R., & Roveda, C. (2014). Foresight for public procurement and regional innovation policy: The case of Lombardy. Research policy, 43(2), 438-50.[DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2013.11.003]
Wan, R. (2014). Public procurement of innovation policy: Competition regulation, market structure and dominant design. Journal of Public Procurement, 14(4), 473-94. [DOI:10.1108/JOPP-14-04-2014-B002]
Wesseling, J. H., & Edquist, C. (2018). Public procurement for innovation to help meet societal challenges: A review and case study. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 493-502. [DOI:10.1093/scipol/scy013]
Yeow, J., & Edler, J. (2012). Innovation procurement as projects. Journal of Public Procurement, 12(4), 472-504. [DOI:10.1108/JOPP-12-04-2012-B002]
Zelenbabic, D. (2015). Fostering innovation through innovation friendly procurement practices: A case study of Danish local government procurement. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(3), 261-81. [DOI:10.1080/13511610.2015.1056724]
)