آسایش، ح.، قربانی، م.، صفری، ر.، برقعی، ا.، رضاپور، ع.، و منصوریان، م.، همکاران. (1390). عوامل مؤثر بر میزان فعالیت‌های آموزشی و پژوهشی اساتید دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گلستان. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 11(3)، 294-295.
شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی. (1395). آئین‌نامه «ارتقای مرتبه اعضای هیأت علمی مؤسسه‌های آموزش عالی، پژوهشی و فناوری دولتی و غیردولتی». قابل دسترس در https://sccr.ir/pro/2093/
خالدی، س. (1393). پژوهش اسنادی. قابل دسترس در https://goo.gl/GQ9Wct
شهسواری، ا.، علم الهدی، ج.، ذاکرصالحی، غ. ر.، و خراسانی، ا. (1399). انقلاب آکادمیک دوم و ظهور دانشگاه کارآفرین؛ خوانش واقع‌گرایانه ظرفیت‌ها و محدویت‌های الگوی دانشگاه کارآفرین به‌مثابه موتور نوآوری. راهبرد فرهنگ، 13(49)، 77-115.
صادقی فسایی، س.، و عرفان‌منش، ا. (1394). مبانی روش‌شناختی پژوهش اسنادی در علوم اجتماعی؛ مورد مطالعه: تأثیرات مدرن‌شدن بر خانواده ایرانی. راهبرد فرهنگ، 8(29)، 61-91.
کریمی مونقی، ح.، ژیانی فرد، ا.، جعفرزاده، ح.، بهنام، ح. ر.، و توکل افشاری، ج. (1394). بررسی موانع و مشکلات روند ارتقا: ناگفته های اعضای هیئت علمی. مجله توسعه آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 8(18)، 73-85.
کریمی مونقی، ح.، ژیانی فرد، ا.، جعفرزاده، ح.، بهنام، ح. ر.، و توکل افشاری، ج. (1393). تجربیات اعضای هیأت علمی از روند ارتقای مرتبه علمی. نشریه گام‌های توسعه در آموزش پزشکی. 11(4)، 485-499.
گندم‌کار, ر.، صلصالی، م.، و میرزازاده، ع. (1390). عوامل مؤثر بر آموزش پزشکی در محیط بالینی: تجارب اعضای هیأت علمی بالینی. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 11(3)، 279-290.
محمدی دوستدار، ح.، و میرحسینی، ع. (1392). سیاست‌ها و فرآیندهای ارتقای اعضای هیأت علمی در دانشگاه‌های منتخب جهان. سیاست‌نامه علم و فناوری، 3(3)، 55-70.
محمدی دوستدار، ح.، و میرحسینی، س. ع. (1387). بررسی تطبیقی معیارهای ارتقای اعضای هیئت علمی در آموزش عالی. سیاست علم و فناوری، 1(3)، 91-102.
References
Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60. [DOI:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279]
Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities-industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. [DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003]
Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 559-80. [DOI:10.1080/1043859092000234311]
Arundel, A., van de Paal, G., & Soete, L. (1995). Innovation strategies of Europe’s largest industrial firms: Results of the PACE survey for information sources, public research, protection of innovations and government programmes; final report. Maastricht: MERIT. https://www.worldcat.org/title/innovation-strategies-of-europes-largest-industrial-firms-results-of-the-pace-survey-for-information-sources-public-research-protection-of-innovations-and-government-programmes-final-report/oclc/314133198
Asayesh, H., Ghorbani, M., Safari, R., Borghaei, A., Rezapour, A., & Mansoorian, et al. (2011). [Effective factors on educational and research activities of the teachers in Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(3), 294-5. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-1282-en.html
Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007]
Bozeman , B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694-707. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007]
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1-67. [DOI:10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8]
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23. [DOI:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273]
Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521. [DOI:10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1]
D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-39. [DOI:10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z]
D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-313. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002]
Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-27. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5]
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and opportunities in early childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 186-200. [DOI:10.1177/1053815111425493]
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64-77. [DOI:10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551]
Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The entrepreneurial university: Vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), 83-97. [DOI:10.5367/ihe.2016.0303]
Gandomkar, R., Salsali, M., & Mirzazadeh, A. (2011). [Factors influencing medical education in clinical environment: Experiences of clinical faculty members (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(3), 279-90. http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-1741-en.html
Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva, 47, 93-114. [DOI:10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2]
Graneheim, U. H, & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001] [PMID]
Grimpe , Ch., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 637-50. [DOI:10.1007/s10961-009-9140-4]
Gulbrandsen, M., & Slipersæter, S. (2007). The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model. In A. Bonaccorsi , & C. Daraio (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation: Specialization and performance in Europe (pp. 112-143). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. [DOI:10.4337/9781847206848.00011]
Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004]
Haeussler, C., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Breaking the Ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40(1), 41-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.012]
Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S., Eds. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. London: The Cochrane Collaboration. [DOI:10.1002/9780470712184]
Karimi Moonaghi, H., Zhianifard, A., Jafarzadeh, H., Behnam, H. R., & Tavakol Afshari, J. (2015). [Survey obstacles and problems promotion process: Untold of faculty members (Persian)]. Journal of Medical Education Development, 8(18), 73-85. http://zums.ac.ir/edujournal/article-1-341-en.html
Karimi Moonaghi, H., Zhianifard, A., Jafarzadeh, H., Behnam, H. R., & Tavakol Afshari, J. (2015). [Experiences of faculty members in relation to the academic promotion process (Persian)]. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 11(4), 485-99. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1368750
Khaledi, S. (2014). [Documentary research (Persian)]. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/GQ9Wct
Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24(2), 185-205. [DOI:10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I]
Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe - the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14, 299-309. [DOI:10.1023/A:1008184601282]
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441-56. [DOI:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169]
Lundvall, B. Å. (2008). Higher education, innovation, and economic development. In J. Yufi Lin, & B. Plescovic (Eds.), Higher education and development: Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2008, Regional: Higher Education and Development, September 2008 (pp. 201-228). Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications. https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/higher-education-innovation-and-economic-development
Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (2006). Science, technology and innovation policy. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0022]
Mansfield, E. (1991). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20(1), 1-12. [DOI:10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-A]
Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55-65. [DOI:10.2307/2109992]
Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-51. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8]
Mohammadi Dostdar, H., & Mirhosseini, A. (2014). [Policies and processes of academic promotion in selected universities of the world (Persian)]. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 3(3), 55-70. http://stpl.ristip.sharif.ir/article_1187.html
Mohammadi Dostdar, H., & Mirhosseini, S. A. (2008). [A comparative investigation of academic promotion criteria in higher (Persian)]. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 1(3), 91-102. http://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12760.html
Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246796517
Mowery, D. (2006). University-industry research collaboration and technology transfer in the United States since 1980. In Sh. Yusuf, & K. Nabeshima, (Eds.), How universities promote economic growth (pp. 163-181). Washington D. C.: The World Bank.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2006). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0008]
Muscio, A. (2008). [Technology transfer in Italy: Results of a survey on university departments (Il trasferimento tecnologico in Italia: Risultati di un’indagine sui dipartimenti universitari) (Italian)]. L’industria, 29(1), 245-68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241762352
National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20160210221014/http:/www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/pdfstart.htm
National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report
Nelson, R. R. (2001). Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of patenting at American universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 13-9. [DOI:10.1023/A:1007875910066]
Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.008]
Pavitt, K. (1998). Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7(2), 105-11. [DOI:10.1093/rev/7.2.105]
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-80. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x]
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2008). Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy, 37(10), 1884-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009]
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., & D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007]
Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2016). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. In P. H. Phan, S. A. Mian, W. Lamine (Eds.), Technology entrepreneurship and business incubation: Theory, practice, lessons learned (pp. 249-272). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing [DOI:10.1142/9781783269778_0009]
Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323-48. [DOI:10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6]
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791. [DOI:10.1093/icc/dtm023]
Sadeqi Fasai, S., & Erfanmanesh, I. (2015). [Methodological principles of documentary research in social sciences; Case of study: Impacts of modernization on Iranian family (Persian)]. Journal of Strategy for Culture, 8(29), 61-91. http://www.jsfc.ir/article_15066.html
Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy, 30(3), 509-32. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00091-3]
Salter, A., D’Este, P., Pavitt, K., Scott, A., Martin, B., & Geuna, A., et al. (2000). Talent, not technology: The impact of publicly funded research on innovation in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246978209
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc. https://books.google.com/books?id=0I6KBQAAQBAJ&dq
Schartinger, D., Rammer, Ch., Fischer, M. M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3), 303-28. [DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1]
Shahsavari, A., Alamolhoda, J., Zaker Salehi, G. R., & Khorasani, A. (2020). [The second academic revolution and the emergence of the entrepreneurial university; realistic readings of capacities and constraints (Persian)]. Journal of Strategy for Culture, 13(49), 77-115. http://www.jsfc.ir/article_101241.html
Shinn, T. (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599-614. [DO:10.1177/0306312702032004004]
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution. (2016). [Regulations “promotion of faculty members of governmental and non-governmental institutions of higher education, research and technology” (Persian)]. Retrieved from https://sccr.ir/pro/2093/
Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.004]
)