حافظ‌نیا، م. ر. (3931). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. تهران: سمت.
دانایی‌فرد، ح. (6831). هم‌سازی شیوه‌های کمّی و کیفی در پژوهش‌های سازمانی: تأملی بر استراتژی پژوهش ترکیبی. حوزه و دانشگاه، 13(35)، 36-53. http://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_448.html
دفتر آمارهای صنعت، معدن و زیربنایی. (4931). اطلاعات پروانه‌های ساختمانی صادر شده توسط شهرداری‌های کشور. تهران: مرکز آمار ایران.
دفتر برنامه‌ریزی کلان برق و انرژی وزارت نیرو. (1931). ترازنامه انرژی سال 0931، وزارت نیرو، معاونت امور برق و انرژی. قابل دسترسی در https://irandataportal.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/1391.pdf
سازمان انرژی های نو ایران. (5931). پمپ حرارتی زمین‌گرمایی. بازیابی در 5931. تهران: سازمان انرژی‌های نو ایران.
عتابی، ف.، هیبتی، س. م. ر.، و مهرخو، س. (3931 ). امکان‌سنجی فنی ـ اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی استفاده از پمپ‌های حرارتی زمین‌گرمایی. علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 61(4)، 57-16. https://jest.srbiau.ac.ir/article_6075.html
گل، م .ع.، و محمدبیگی، ا. (3931). بررسی تمایل پزشکان بخش خصوصی نسبت به مشارکت در برنامه پزشک خانواده با استفاده از مدل انتشار نوآوری، قم سال 1931. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی قم، 8(1)، 43-72. http://journal.muq.ac.ir/article-1-167-fa.html
مرکز آمار ایران .(0931). نتایج آمارگیری از مصرف حامل‌های انرژی در بخش خانوار شهری. تهران: مرکز آمار ایران، معاونت برنامه‌ریزی و نظارت راهبردی.
مرکز آمار ایران (1931). چکیده یافته‌های طرح آمارگیری از مصرف حامل‌های انرژی در بخش خانوار در نقاط شهری- 0931. تهران: دفتر صنعت، معدن و زیربنایی.
References
Assefa, G., & Frostell, B. (2007). Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies. Technology in Society, 29(1), 63-78. [DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.007]
Batel, S., Devine-Wright, P., & Tangeland, T. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy, 58, 1-5.[DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018]
Brohmann, B., Feenstra, Y., & Heiskanen, E. (2007). Factors influencing the societal acceptance of new, renewable and energy efficiency technologies: Meta-analysis of recent European projects. Paper presented at European Roundtable for Sustainable Consumption and Production, Basel, June 20-22 2007. https://media.africaportal.org/documents/07Brohmann_et_al-_Meta-analysis.pdf
Devine-Wright, P. (2007). Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: A critical review. Beyond Nimbyism: A multidisciplinary investigation of public engagement with renewable energy technologies. Manchester: University of Manchester. http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/beyond_nimbyism/deliverables/bn_wp1_4.pdf
Devine‐Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology, 8(2), 125-139.[DOI:10.1002/we.124]
Fawcett, T. (2011). The future role of heat pumps in the domestic sector. University of Oxford: Environmental Change Institute. https://www.eceee.org/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Summer_Studies/2011/6-innovations-in-buildings-and-appliances/the-future-role-of-heat-pumps-in-the-domestic-sector/
Halaweh, M. (2013). Emerging technology: What is it. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 8(3), 108-15. [DOI:10.4067/S0718-27242013000400010]
Heiskanen, E., Matschoss, K., & Kuusi, H. (2013). Report on specific features of public and social acceptance and perception of nearly zero-energy buildings and renewable heating and cooling in Europe with a specific focus on the target countries. Report in the frame of the IEE project ENTRANZE. https://www.entranze.eu/files/downloads/ENTRANZE_D2_6_Final_version.pdf
Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Zamanillo, I., & Laskurain, I. (2013). Social acceptance of ocean wave energy: A case study of an OWC shoreline plant. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 27, 515-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.032]
Hlavinka, A. N., Mjelde, J. W., Dharmasena, S., & Holland, C. (2016). Forecasting the adoption of residential ductless heat pumps. Energy Economics, 54, 60-7.[DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.020]
Iniyan, S., Suganthi, L., & Samuel, A. A. (2001). A survey of social acceptance in using renewable energy sources for the new millennium. Renewable Energy, 24(3-4), 657-61. [DOI:10.1016/S0960-1481(01)00052-0]
Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. (2008). Security of supply and regulation of energy networks. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4584-4589. [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.007]
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23. [DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056]
Kasanen, P., & Lakshmanan, T. R. (1989). Residential heating choices of Finnish households. Economic Geography, 65(2), 130-145. [DOI:10.2307/143777]
Kohl, C., Knigge, M., Baader, G., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2018). Anticipating acceptance of emerging technologies using twitter: the case of self-driving cars. Journal of Business Economics. 88(5), 617-642. [DOI:10.1007/s11573-018-0897-5]
Mahapatra, K., Gustavsson, L., & Madlener, R. (2007). Bioenergy innovations: The case of wood pellet systems in Sweden. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(1), 99-125. [DOI:10.1080/09537320601065423]
Mahapatra, K., Gustavsson, L., & Nair, G. (2009, June). Swedish homeowners’ perceptions of innovative heating systems–results of three surveys [Internet]. Retrieved from https://www.eceee.org/static/media/uploads/site-2/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Summer_Studies/2009/Panel_8/8.008/paper.pdf
Majuri, P. (2016). Ground source heat pumps and environmental policy–The Finnish practitioner’s point of view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 740-749.[DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.017]
Michelsen, C. C., & Madlener, R. (2010). Integrated theoretical framework for a homeowner’s decision in favor of an innovative residential heating system. FCN Working Paper, 2, 41. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1620520]
Michelsen, C. C., & Madlener, R. (2011). Homeowners’ preferences for adopting residential heating systems: A discrete choice analysis for Germany. FCN Working Paper, 9, 42. [DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.06.009]
Moula, M. M. E., Maula, J., Hamdy, M., Fang, T., Jung, N., & Lahdelma, R. (2013). Researching social acceptability of renewable energy technologies in Finland. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 2(1), 89-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.10.001]
Lund, H. (2014). Renewable energy systems: A smart energy systems approach to the choice and modeling of 100% renewable solutions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=
Goetzler, W., Zogg, R., Lisle, H., & Burgos, J. (2009). Ground-source heat pumps. Overview of market status, barriers to adoption, and options for overcoming barriers. Chicago, IL: Navigant Consulting, Inc. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1219308
Noorollahi, Y., Bigdelou, P., Pourfayaz, F., & Yousefi, H. (2016). Numerical modeling and economic analysis of a ground source heat pump for supplying energy for a greenhouse in Alborz province, Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 145-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.059]
Nyrud, A. Q., Roos, A., & Sande, J. B. (2008). Residential bioenergy heating: A study of consumer perceptions of improved woodstoves. Energy Policy, 36(8), 3169-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.019]
Secretariat, R. (2012). Renewables 2012 global status report. Rep Paris: REN12. https://www.eqmagpro.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/gsr_2020_presentation_compressed-1-10.pdf
Stacks, D. W., & Salwen, M. B. (Eds.). (2014). An integrated approach to communication theory and research. Milton Park: Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusioin of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., & Martin, B. R. (2015). What is an emerging technology? Research Policy. 44(10), 1827-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006]
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(2), 14-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102473
Song, Y., Kim, D., & Han, D. (2013). Risk communication in South Korea: Social acceptance of nuclear power plants (NPPs). Public Relations Review. 39(1), 55-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.10.002]
Sopha, B. M., & Klöckner, C. A. (2011). Psychological factors in the diffusion of sustainable technology: A study of Norwegian households’ adoption of wood pellet heating. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6), 2756-2765. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.027]
Sopha, B. M., Klöckner, C. A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2013). Adoption and diffusion of heating systems in Norway: Coupling agent-based modeling with empirical research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 8, 42-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2013.06.001]
Sopha, B. M., Klöckner, C. A., Skjevrak, G., & Hertwich, E. G. (2010). Norwegian households’ perception of wood pellet stove compared to air-to-air heat pump and electric heating. Energy Policy, 38(7), 3744-54.[DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.052]
Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing. 22, 960-967. [DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137]
Tapaninen, A., Seppanen, M., & Makinen, S. (2009). Characteristics of innovation: A customer-centric view of barriers to the adoption of a renewable energy system. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 4(1-2), 98-113. [DOI:10.1504/IJASM.2009.023250]
Henkel, J. (2012). Modelling the diffusion of innovative heating systems in Germany–decision criteria, influence of policy instruments and vintage path dependencies [PhD. Dissertation]. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin. https://www.depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/3486
Wikipedia. (2016). Geothermal heat pump [Internet]. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_heat_pump
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001]
Yuan, X., Zuo, J., & Ma, C. (2011). Social acceptance of solar energy technologies in China—End users’ perspective. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1031-6.[DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.003]
)